Ms Rina Bovrisse’s case

Prada Wears Devil in Eyes of This ‘Ugly’ Woman: William Pesek

Prada Wears Devil in Eyes of This ‘Ugly’

 

 Woman: William Pesek

By William Pesek - Sep 10, 2010 5:00 AM GMT+0900

Bloomberg Opinion  

Rina Bovrisse poses for a photograph in Tokyo. Bovrisse, 36, became a cause célèbre because of her sexual-discrimination lawsuit against Prada. The former senior retail manager claims she was harassed as “ugly” by Prada Japan’s top executive and was unfairly dismissed. Photographer: Tomohiro Ohusmi/Bloomberg

Rina Bovrisse isn’t Japan’s Gloria Steinem. Yet she may just be the heroine for which economists have been waiting.

Bovrisse, 36, became a cause celebre because of her sexual- discrimination lawsuit against Prada. The former senior retail manager claims she was harassed as “ugly” by Prada Japan’s top executive and was unfairly dismissed.

This drama might garner modest attention in Milan, New York or Paris. Coming in Japan, where women’s rights are often a novel idea, it’s a shocking spectacle. Japanese women are supposed to maintain a stiff upper lip when being mistreated in the workplace. That’s how it is. Deal with it.

Bovrisse is having none of that, and good for her. In her frustration, she’s doing more than anyone in recent memory to highlight a major cause of Japan’s malaise: a chronic disregard for the female workforce. It hinders growth, adds to public debt, reduces competitiveness and feeds other challenges like the nation’s falling birthrate.

“So many smart, driven, talented Japanese women are tired of not being treated equally,” Bovrisse told me in a Tokyo cafe last week. “I am speaking out for them. We must have the courage to demand to be treated fairly.”

Fat Resume

The 18-year fashion-industry veteran and Parsons School of Design graduate had worked at Prada USA and Chanel SA. She had worked in New York, London, Paris (the name Bovrisse comes from her marriage to a Frenchman) and Hawaii. Presumably, it was that resume that prompted Prada Japan to hire Bovrisse in April 2009 to oversee 500 employees in 40 shops. And then, she says, the trouble began.

Bovrisse says she was told to get rid of 15 managers and assistant managers for being “old, fat, ugly, disgusting or not having the Prada look.” Later in her six-month stint there, she claims to have been told to lose weight and change her hairstyle. Bovrisse says she complained to company headquarters in Milan and was fired soon after.

Prada spokeswoman Mia Morikawa said the company wouldn’t comment for this column, and referred me to previous statements dismissing Bovrisse’s claims. Last month, Prada Japan countersued Bovrisse for allegedly damaging its image.

I find Bovrisse’s story persuasive. Two former Prada staffers have joined her lawsuit.

Empowering Women

That’s just the point. There’s a reason why representatives from the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women met with Bovrisse last month. It’s the same reason why the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development calls on Japan to empower women.

Japan’s per-capita-income rankings tend to be a mirror image of those reflecting women’s participation in politics and corporate management. At present, none of the companies in the Nikkei 225 Stock Average is run by a woman.

Women have fared poorly since the Lehman Shock of late 2008, being hit disproportionately by Wall Street’s meltdown. Because many are hired on part-time contracts, they are easiest to cut when corporate profits evaporate.

Japan’s seniority-based and male-dominated model has been slow to better utilize fully one half of the nation’s 126 million people. Neglecting 50 percent of your labor force is terrible economics. Japan built bridges, dams and roads to nowhere and cut interest rates to zero in a bid to raise living standards. It’s dragged its feet on better harnessing the talents of its female masses.

Stepping Forward

“It pains me to think women haven’t come further than this,” Bovrisse said.

Japan needs more Bovrisse’s to step forward. If Japanese women are waiting for their male leaders to champion their cause, they’re mistaken. They need to demand a bigger say in Japan’s business and political systems if they want true change. It’s a key to Japan becoming a meritocracy.

Societal norms are a powerful dynamic and they’re sometimes summed up with a proverb: The nail that sticks up gets hammered down. Cases of sexism often don’t get reported for fear of making waves or being at the center of a potential scandal.

Yet women should make waves, and big ones. Gender discrimination in Japan often seems like one of those unfixable issues. When you talk about it, people nod knowingly and shrug.

Job applicants in Japan find nothing odd about attaching a photo to their resumes, or including their date of birth. There’s little outcry when the response of Tokyo subway operators to complaints about groping on trains is segregation: women-only cars.

The literary and cinematic worlds tell us “The Devil Wears Prada.” In Bovrisse’s story, you could say Prada wears the devil. Yet, as even our heroine will admit, this tale is much bigger than the experience of one woman. It’s about the future of the third-biggest economy.

And grudgingly, Bovrisse is sensing her Steinem-like role in this economic drama. It’s on her new business cards, which read: “Fashionista Feminista.”

(William Pesek is a Bloomberg News columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.)

To contact the writer of this column: William Pesek in Tokyo at wpesek@bloomberg.net

PAGE TOP▲

Dr. Schoepp-Schilling receives an Award!

      Dr. Schoepp-Schilling receives an Award!

 

Former CEDAW Member, Dr. Schoepp-Schilling was awarded the Margherita von Brentano Award 2008 from the Freie Universitaet Berlin.

 

Dr. Hanna Beate Schoepp-Schilling has been active domestically in internationally for the pursuit and realization of the rights of women and human rights. The Freie Universitaet Berlin presents the Award for her lifetime activities, in particular for her efforts towards the elimination of discrimination against women. (Translated from the University website.)

 

Dr. Schoepp-Schilling was a Member of CEDAW from Germany, from 1989 to 2008, and was one of the most experienced veterans of the Committee. She has contributed greatly to the promotion of equality between men and women for the women in Japan, including the plaintiffs of the cases against the Sumitomo manufacturers. Dr. Schoepp-Schilling and Professor Hiroko Hayashi of Fukuoka University have been friends since the early days, when they were both students of late Professor Alice H. Cook of Cornell University in the United States. In 1998, we invited Dr. Schoepp-Schilling to Japan through Professor Hayashi, and organized an international symposium “Learning from the EU on gender equality law.”

At the CEDAW meeting in 2003, when the Japanese government report was examined, we lobbied Dr. Schoepp-Schilling during lunch time with the plaintiffs of the Sumitomo cases. During the CEDAW session, she raised pointed questions on the career track-based personnel system, whether the majority of part-time workers being women could be considered indirect discrimination, on the Guideline under the Equal Employment Opportunity Law allowing different employment management categories, on the concentration of women in lower paid areas with fewer promotions, which could be considered indirect discrimination in other advanced countries, and whether the practice of employment management categories could amount to indirect discrimination. These were reflected in the recommendations from CEDAW. How these recommendations helped in achieving the successful settlement of the Sumitomo Electric Industries case is explained in page 2 of this Newsletter.

By   Shizuko Koedo  Chairperson  Working Women’s Network

 

 

Dr. Schoepp-Schilling posed questions to the Japanese government representatives so intensively during the UN Committee session in July 2003 that the representative responded that she also felt frustrated by the slow progress in Japan. I still remember with great emotion, Dr. Schoepp-Schilling’s clear voice and resolute stance. And this led to the wonderful recommendation from CEDAW.

When I went to the UN in New York to appeal about our case in January 1994, before I started the case against my employer, Dr. Schoepp-Schilling took our case very seriously, and we have been encouraged by her ever since. The Award is a wonderful acknowledgement of her efforts over these long years.  By  Former Plaintiff of Sumitomo Electric Ms Katsumi Nishimura

 

We have known Dr. Schoepp-Schilling since we went to the UN for the first time in 1994. We also met her by chance a number of times, including the time she passed by the restaurant, where we were having a meal in Geneva in 2001, and also at the time when we met her and her husband in a small museum in New York.

During the CEDAW session in 2003, Dr. Schoepp-Schilling looked much larger than her usual self, when she was asking pointed questions to the Japanese representative after we appealed our case to her over lunch.  By Former Plaintiff of Sumitomo Chemical Ms  Kinuko Ishida

 

 

 

 

PAGE TOP▲

HOME PAGE TOP